Concept
The primary goal of the Maricopa Institute for Learning (MIL) is to enhance the quality of teaching and learning through a process of individual faculty's defining, implementing, evaluating, documenting, and disseminating a project focused on significant issues in student learning in their teaching fields.

From L-R (Rear): 1999-2000 Fellows:
Barbara Fahey, SCC, English, Marian Gibney, PC,
Psychology, Mangala Joshua, MCC, Physics, (Front)
Rosemary Leary, EMCC, Chemistry, LynnAnn
Wojciechowicz, SMCC, Humanities
|

From L-R (Standing): 2000-2001 Fellows: Madeleine
Chowdhury, MCC, Mathematics; Holly McKinzie Beene,
MIL Faculty Chair, MCLI; Maria Chavira, MCC, Psychology;
Yvonne Montiel, SMCC, Reading, Education, Spanish;
(Sitting) Vanessa Wilson-Ford, MCC, Sociology; Sara Soller,
PC, Communication and Theater
|
Model
The MIL is modeled after the Pew National
Fellowship Program for Carnegie Scholars.
It includes the following elements:
COMMUNITY
- 5-6 faculty, a faculty chair, and a program manager.
PROJECTS THAT
- investigate how and under what conditions students learn;
- can be tested with students;
- can be documented and made public;
- contribute to the scholarship of teaching and learning in a discipline;
- have implications beyond an individual classroom.
EVENTS
- Retreat
- Seminars
- Monthly meetings
RESOURCES
- Release time
- Travel to national conferences
- Book and article allowance
- Reference library
- mcli expertise
Process
Faculty are nominated by their President, Dean of Instruction, and/or Faculty Developer. Nominated Faculty are invited to submit a project proposal. Submitted proposals are evaluated via a blind process by a committee of former MIL Fellows, faculty discipline specialists, and a representative from the deans. The proposals with the top five aggregate scores are selected. Fellows participate in the Fellowship for a year, beginning with a summer seminar in early June.
Projects
Fellows' project topics for the first two years
of the program illustrate the range and
implications for student learning:
- Research on Methods for Increasing Students' Ability to Think Critically
- Reframing Teaching to Meet Teacher and Student Goals in Psychology 101
- Using the Modeling Method to Enhance Student Learning of Physics
- Problem Based Learning in Introductory Chemistry
- Illuminating Integrated Humanities Classes with Historical Storytelling
- Teacher as Researcher: Providing a Seamless Process in Teacher Education
- The Role of Visualization in Understanding Calculus
- A Pedagogical Model for Active Learning: Collaborative Peer Teaching a Course on Diversity
- Using Empirical Evidence To Improve Teaching And Learning On The Internet
- The Influence of Teacher Oral Communication Style on Student Learning
For more information:
www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/mil/
Maria Harper-Marinick, Ph.D. MCLI
"Viewing teaching as scholarly work is essential. Teachers so often have to carry out their work in isolation from their colleagues. The result is that those who engage in innovative acts of teaching do not have many opportunities to build upon the work of others." Lee S. Shulman, President, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
|
We welcome our 2001-2002 Fellows to MIL
Scott Adamson, CGCC Mathematics
Debbie Anderson, EMCC Library and Information Science
John Gibson, GCC Computer Information Systems
Sian Proctor, SMCC Geology
Nancy Siefer, GCC English
Elizabeth Skinner, GWCC Reading
|
|