MCCCD - Integrated Learning Communities
Back Part 3 - Phase 2
Next


Steps for Initiating a Learning Community

Phase Two: Implementation

Observing in Linked Courses

When the linked courses are implemented, instructors should plan to attend the sessions of all courses daily, especially the first time a faculty member is involved, or the first time a particular set of classes are integrated. It is during the observing of the other instructor's presentation that one is most likely to identify both global and specific areas of integration. Assignments may be spontaneously adapted to take advantage of these insights. Similarly, conceptual frameworks may become apparent while observing the community. While one instructor listens to other instructors interact with the students, s/he can focus on the global design of the course--often resulting in "ah ha" experiences which constitute the basis of the community framework.

Keeping a Daily Log

It is beneficial to keep a daily log--especially the first time that a learning community is offered. An informal log might include:
  • daily entries describing scheduled activities
  • daily events actually taking place
  • daily reflections with suggestions
  • periodic reflections on the progression of the community
  • periodic discussions of any problem areas or areas of strength
  • framework diagrams
  • classroom research summaries
  • student handouts designed for the community (due dates, mutual assignments, etc.)
  • flyers designed for the community (schedule graphics, advertising flyers, etc.).

Although informal, this log provides a source of reference both during the semester and in future semesters; it aids in identifying connections and in developing them into frameworks. It also supplies the majority of information for a final report.

Conducting Classroom Research

Including classroom research allows instructors to monitor how the course is progressing. They can regularly ask the students for brief oral or written responses to questions such as: "Where do you see the courses overlapping?" "What are you most comfortable with in the community?" "What is making you uncomfortable in the community?" In our first STARS program, for example, we found that the students were confused over assignment due dates because of the complexity of the interrelated syllabi. During the semester, we explored a number of strategies to help students overcome this confusion. In the more seamless CLOUT program, we were excited when students reported that they could not differentiate between courses. While this was viewed by us as a success, we learned that students need to feel some sense of control, so we began to periodically identify the content area under focus.

Through the use of classroom research in our LINK learning community, we became aware of a need for greater flexibility. The students' comfort level with various aspects of course content varied. Early in the semester, our developmental students were intimidated by the psychology content and much class time was spent going over basic concepts and helping students deal with the textbook. As students gained confidence in their ability to handle college level material, they expressed greater anxiety over writing; we thus spent more class time on writing skills.

Inviting Guest Observers

Inviting key personnel to observe and/or participate in the community results in better understanding of the purpose, dynamics, and benefits of the community. This, in turn, results in increased support. For example, our college president, dean, associate dean, and division chair have all attended our classes. As a result, we have had tremendous support from administration. We heard comments such as, "this is what true learning is all about" and "I never really understood exactly what you were doing before coming to the class." Guests should also include advisors and counselors since their support is essential in identifying the type of students who would most benefit from the community.

Assessing Student Outcomes

An LC provides an environment which lends itself to comprehensive student outcome assessment. Because an extended period of time is available, new approaches can be explored which might be less feasible in a stand alone course. We used some traditional and some new (to us) assessment tools in our communities including:
  • pre/post assessment
    diagnostic essays
    skill testing
    surveys of competency mastery and goal achievement
  • student anthology publication
  • course evaluations
  • classroom research
  • collaborative and individual activities to apply skills and to assess areas of need
  • student focus groups with outside moderator
  • faculty interview with outside interviewer
  • Measure of Intellectual Development (MID) -- based on Perry's scheme of cognitive development, uses essays rated by test-maker
  • computerized diagnostics and tutorials




Back Table of Contents Next