@forum

Spring 1998
Vol 6 Issue 2

IN THIS ISSUE...

Change or Efficacy?

Propensity to Change...

I Can Never Go Back

New Alignments in Calculus Instruction

Change: Do We Really Have a Choice?

Change, Learning, and the Future.

Kaleidoscope Education

...the Learning Continues

Using a Student's Fund of Knowledge to Guide Discovery

You Say You Want and Evolution?

SEE ALSO...
The Labyrinth

Discussion

Maricopa Center for Learning and Instruction

The Forum... Sharing Information on teaching and Learning

learning@maricopa.edu...The Learning Cotinues!
By Jackie Moran & Naomi Story

The learning initiative taking place at Maricopa continues to make headway. Last fall, the initiative was bolstered by the publication of the paper, "learning@maricopa.edu". Authored by two faculty members, Bob Bendotti (PVCC) and Donna Tannehill (RSC), the paper serves to stimulate the dialogue on learning and to encourage actions that would solidify learning as a core value throughout the Maricopa Community College system.

learning@maricopa.edu is one of the results of our ACE (American Council on Education) Project Team on Leadership and Institutional Transformation. This faculty-based team inherited the challenge of implementing learning as the core value of our system. An earlier document, "Maricopa Roundtable Policy Draft," provided the initial catalyst for strategic conversations in our institutional transformation. However, the project team realized quickly that few among our faculty had a chance to review and discuss its merits.

Between October 1996 and early spring of 1997, faculty throughout Maricopa were engaged in discourse on the initial roundtable document. Responses were collected and, in the summer of 1996, Bendotti and Tannehill reviewed thirty-six responses from across the district. Those responses became the starting point of a discussion on what learning means at Maricopa and the basis for learning@maricopa.edu. Everyone at Maricopa appeared to be interested in the dialogue on learning and incorporating learning in a more holistic way. But the MCCD as a whole seemed to lack a coherent and sustainable system that could foster such a dialogue and allow for action toward a learning-centered organization.

learning@maricopa.edu offers three primary areas of consideration that could assist in creating such a coherent and sustainable system. The first embraces a systems perspective, which asks every individual to consider how his/her own work affects and is affected by the larger systems that surround it.

The second area recognizes that developing shared meanings is essential. With that in mind, the authors offer several characteristics of learning for readers to consider. The characteristics include stating that learning is complex, transformational, natural and life-long, multi-level, fundamentally personal yet also social, active and interactive, measurable, and that learning is greatly influenced by organizational factors, including leadership, culture, and structures. Each of these areas are discussed briefly in the paper.

The third area learning@maricopa.edu considers is action. The action that the paper suggests encourages us to go beyond the rhetoric or definition of learning. For example, we should question and assess our current systems, processes or structures. We should, then, reform those that are barriers to learning.

The paper concludes by encouraging readers to continue the dialogue throughout their colleges and the MCCD. The ACE Project Team has set in motion a plan to do just that. Last November, shortly after the paper began to be distributed among the colleges, South Mountain became the first MCCD college to host an Open Space Forum on learning. This forum incorporated the Open Space Technology method, which allowed participants to identify and discuss their issues and notions about learning as well as their inspired directions and commitment to action.

Some of the issues that participants raised included integrated learning communities, academic class structure (scheduling, credits, load hours), convenience at the risk of learning, how FTSE drives structure, and the faculty as learner. Participants also suggested individual and organizational actions such as questioning new delivery methods and contributing to their soundness, convening a district-wide forum to assess what has and hasn't worked in learning communities, exploring different loading for the multi-level developmental educational community, working in concert with others on FTSE reform, and being a model of lifelong professional learning.

Overall, participants enjoyed the Open Space method and encouraged its use at other Forums. The success of the South Mountain meeting has led to additional forums which will be scheduled. On February 20, Mesa Community College held its own Open Space Forum, and a GateWay Forum is scheduled for April 7.

The ultimate goal of the ACE Project Team is to transform the institution, the Maricopa system, and to make learning a true and authentic core value for everyone. learning@maricopa.edu is one of the catalysts. The other is the Open Space Forum. Clearly, the ultimate outcome will be evidenced by each of us making decisions and choices based on learning.

We encourage everyone -- students, faculty, Governing Board members, staff, administrators, and our extended constituents and partners -- to read the paper and to join the discourse, so that we can together recast our system to be a truly authentic learning-centered system. As one participant at SMCC said, "We just need to do it."

See more at the learning@maricop.edu web site:
http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/learning/