|


Spring 1998
Vol 6 Issue 2
IN THIS ISSUE...
Change or Efficacy?
Propensity
to Change...
I Can
Never Go Back
New
Alignments in Calculus Instruction
Change:
Do We Really Have a Choice?
Change,
Learning, and the Future.
Kaleidoscope
Education
...the
Learning Continues
Using a Student's Fund of
Knowledge to Guide Discovery
You
Say You Want and Evolution?
SEE ALSO...
The Labyrinth
Discussion
Maricopa
Center for Learning and Instruction
|
Using a Student's Fund of Knowledge to Guide Discovery
Maria Romo Chavira, MCC
In addition to receiving a college education, today's student is looking for a
smoother transition from college to work. In order to fulfill this need, teachers
are seeking new teaching methods that will enable students to make a cohesive transition
from high school to college and from college to work. All too often, the traditional
didactic teaching approach makes students passive learners and does not take into
account a student's interests and experience. Students need to learn how to transfer
their knowledge to other settings and develop the ability to think critically and
learn independently. The classroom provides the perfect opportunity for the instructor
to guide the student to new discoveries.
Research conducted by the U.S. Department of Education's National Assessment of Educational
Progress "indicate[s] that current curricula and teaching methods successfully
impart facts and rote skills to most students but fail to impart high-order reasoning
and learning skills" (Bruer, 1993). Each teacher has the opportunity to design
a unique learning community through the decisions they make about curriculum design/presentation
and assessment of learning. In my opinion, traditional educational approaches are
not meeting the needs of a large majority of students because the student population
is more diverse compared to the student population 20 years ago. For example, the
Digest of Education Statistics (1996) illustrates an increase in the number of students
who work in order to finance their education. The number of older students has been
growing more rapidly than the number of younger students. Between 1980 and 1990 the
enrollment of students under age 25 increased by 3 percent (Digest of Education Statistics,
1996). Between 1993 and 1995, enrollment rates in 2-year institutions for Hispanics
increased (Digest of Education Statistics, 1996).
To account for the changing demographics of today's typical college population, I
have adopted a teaching framework which I believe will help to prepare students for
the many challenges they will face in the work force and in their academic careers.
My philosophy has been influenced by Vygotsky's (1978, 1988) assertion that acquisition
of psychological tools, language, concepts, (et cetera) is influenced by social variables.
According to Wertsch (1985) "One of the most fundamental assumptions that guided
Vygotsky's attempt to reformulate psychology ... [was] to understand the individual,
one must first understand the social relations in which the individual exists."
Under this assumption, it is important to understand the knowledge that students
bring to the classroom. This awareness can then be used as a teaching tool to help
students understand concepts which are unfamiliar by bridging the concepts with the
student's unique knowledge and experiences.
My teaching methodology emphasizes that students learn to answer "why"
questions and are encouraged to explain and defend their positions. My assessments
do not typically include the standardized tests which require rote memorization,
but rather require that students demonstrate their understanding of basic principles.
Some of my teaching strategies include:
- critical thinking and conceptual understanding
- problem solving based on real-life problems
- meaning-centered rather than memorization-oriented learning opportunities
- active learning and activity-based instruction
- contextualized learning which makes connections to students' experiences
- collaborative learning in groups
- interdisciplinary learning
For example, in my research methods course, students develop a research project based
on their own interests and then work together with other students as a research team.
One of the goals of the team is to allow students to critically analyze the research
methodologies of the other students in their group. This method allows students to
use their knowledge and understanding of research and apply it to a real problem.
For instance, in the beginning of the course, the students are to develop a research
hypothesis. Team members will present their research hypothesis and explain their
interest in the topic. The other team members must use their understanding of the
alternative hypothesis and the null hypothesis to determine if the presented hypothesis
meets the requirements of a "good research hypothesis." Students share
their ideas in small groups and use their Collabra listserv accounts to communicate
their discussions with the whole class and instructor. The students then present
their findings to the instructor who further questions their conclusions to determine
the students' understanding and application.
This framework is a marked shift from the traditional prescriptive approach (old
paradigm) that identifies the general subject matter objectives that students are
expected to learn. Using this approach, students are able to master nine essential
skills:
- use of technology
- problem solving
- reading
- integrative thinking
- writing
- teamwork
- communication competence
- quality work
- critical/analytical thinking
The following comments were made by students enrolled in my research methods course
fall 1997:
I liked the project because it helped me learn what to do with my future research
papers. It gave me a good outline on how to go about doing a research paper.
It was good that you did not have tests. To me, that's all short term memory stuff.
But with the project, you actually do something and learn about what the paper should
consist of.
I feel as though I learned a lot about research and it gave me a good idea of what
it might be like.
This class has really opened my eyes to the research world and what it portrays to
the public.
I think that the project idea is a lot better than tests. In every other class there
are tests and many people cram for them and forget.
As part of their research teams, students use Collabra, a product of Netscape, to
communicate with their research teams, the instructor, and the class. Students use
technology to assist them with their problem-solving skills. For example, if a student
is having difficulty understanding why their proposal does not meet the criteria
for good research, other students will use their critical thinking skills by applying
their knowledge to the problem which is communicated to the student via Collabra.
Collabra also allows students to communicate with their instructors more frequently.
If a student is having trouble with a project, for example, they are able to contact
me directly, and I am able to respond promptly. Students are also required to join
a discussion group pertaining to their research topic which allows them to keep abreast
of the national debate. I have found that joining a national listserv increases a
student's motivation because they realize their topic is of national concern and
not merely a project for their class.
For more information about this teaching methodology, please contact:
Maria Romo Chavira, Ph.D.
Psychology Department
Mesa Community Colleges
References
Bruer, J.T. Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom.
MA: MIT Press, 1993.
U.S. Department of Education. The Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC:
US Government Printing Office, 1996. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=96133XXXXX
Vygotsky, L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Vygotsky, L.S. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1934.
Wertsch, J.V. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press,
1985.
|