learning@maricopa.edu / events / OSF Meeting 04.07.98 / Issues

learning@maricopa.edu - Maricopa Community Colleges
Open Spaces Meeting 04.07.98

BACK
Issue: Measuring the Impact of Technology on Learning
NEXT


Title: Measuring the Impact of Technology on Learning

Convener: Fred Gaudet - GWCC

Facilitator: Fred Gaudet - GWCC

Attendees: Fred Gaudet - GWCC, Alan Levine - MCLI, Gloria Stahmer - GWCC, Doyle Burke - MCC

Discussion:

  • learning@maricopa.edu has a section on measurement (p. 13).
  • Does technology impact the speed of learning, retention, and quantity of learning?
  • Do grades measure learning; is learning measurable?
  • It is important to ask whether technology has an impact on learning.
  • What does technology do in the learning process?
  • Can we measure applications of technology in the teaching/learning process?
  • Is technology an enabler or an inhibitor?
  • Can learning be measured?
  • How can we know that learning has occurred?
  • Something is measurable, but what?
  • What is measurable?

Performance-based activities seem to be measurable
Concepts are more difficult to measure
Easier to measure skills
Can technology be measured in assessing skills development?

  • Why do we want to measure whether technology enhances learning?

So much hullabaloo over cost
Some faculty are questioning whether technology is worth it

  • What is the alternative to technology use?
  • Shift of the question: While it is apparent that technology won’t go away, the question is what impact it will have on the society (academic society).
  • Is it appropriate to measure the impact on the teaching/learning process as opposed to measuring learning?
  • Faculty may or may not use technology. Will students rise up and make demands of faculty?
  • Question: where do we put our scarce resources?
  • Report: some chairs have ordered faculty to use technology. Some faculty use an outline program, but question the effectiveness.
  • Is it possible to assess outcomes? It depends. Outcomes may be vague.
  • Some students like PowerPoint because the faculty member is more organized.
  • An array of possibilities may be more effective.
  • Question: What is the alternative?
  • It is important to help faculty plan to use technology effectively.

Much of instruction is a focus of "Me, the transmitter of information."

  • Shift: How does technology facilitate learning?
  • We still have to assess learning, but there is talk of third-party assessment.
  • Is there any research that suggests that technology makes learning worse? (None reported.)



BACK
table of contents
NEXT