--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- | Maricopa Community Colleges | I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Date: 15-Sep-1998 05:17pm MST From: Alan Levine LEVINE, ALAN Dept: MCLI Tel No: 731-8297 TO: Distribution to 48 addressees. Use SH option to view. Subject: Web Coursware Tools : 10/8 demo In the first of series of college technology demos coordinated by the Ocotillo faculty chairs, on October 8, Phoenix College will host a demonstation and discussion on a system called "webCT". As outlined in the attached memos, there is a chance for Maricopa to obtain a liberally priced site license, if we feel it is a wise investment. The tentative agenda... 10/8 Phoenix College, Encanto Room, lower level of Library 2:00 - 3:00 Demonstrations of webCT as used at PC and perhaps MCC 3:00 - 4:00 Teleconfernce/webCT chat session with software developers Murray Goldberg, Vancouver BC 4:00 - ?? more disucssion, hands on access Please share with others. I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M Date: 08-Jun-1998 10:15am MST From: Alan Levine LEVINE, ALAN Dept: MCLI Tel No: 731-8297 TO: Distribution to 33 addressees. Subject: WebCT: Web Course Tools One of the consistent threads form the 1998 Ocotillo Retreat: http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/ocotillo/retreat98 was a desire for less "wheel re-invention" and perhaps some agreement upon widely used, sound technologies in support of learning. This message is meant to open a dialogue in consideration of potential shared interest in one of the leading tools for web courseware development. "WebCT" (http://www.webct.com/) was developed at the University of British Columbia, and has been adopted by UCLA, the University of Georgia, and recently the state of Florida. At least two of our colleges that I know of (Mesa, PC) have been using it for some time. Recently I had the opportunity to meet the developer of this program, Murray Goldberg of UBC, and he is willing to talk to us about different ways Maricopa might benefit from a combined licensing of their product, as mentioned in his message below. I have not had vast experience with this program and would defer to the opinions of Billie Hughes and others at PC as well as faculty and the CTL at Mesa. We could through Ocotillo, convene an intitial informational discussion later this summer, and Murray has expressed a willingness to participate via videoconferencing. Please share this idea with others and invite them to comment. -- alan ------------------------------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 09:25:38 -0700 From: "Murray W. Goldberg" Subject: Re: webct @ maricopa Sender: goldberg@cs.ubc.ca To: alan Organization: UBC Computer Science MIME-version: 1.0 Hi Alan - thanks for the note. Yes - we would be happy to work on a site license for the 10 colleges. We have just received the word that FLorida will be ordering a state-wide license, so we have some precedent to go on. There are a couple possibilities here. The first, and probably the best given your large population, is for a license that allows any number of servers. Normally the cost for a single-campus, single-server license is $3,000 per year. If a single campus wanted an unlimited number of servers, then the cost would be $3,000 plus $1,000 for every 5,000 FTE students. For example, for a campus of 10,000, the yearly cost would be $5,000. That is the normal pricing. If you would like a single license allowing any number of servers at your institutions I propose the following (it is similar to the Florida deal). We would allow any of your 10 campuses to "opt in". For any campus opting in, we would allow them to set up any number of servers for their campus. The charge would be as follows (all are annual): $10,000 plus $1,000 for each campus that "opted in". In the hope that all ten campuses opted in, the total cost would be $20,000 per year. The alternative of having each buy a single-server license is $30,000, and of each buying multi-server licenses is about $50,000. Anyway - that is my proposal. Let me know if any of this works for you, and if not, feel free to propose an alternative. As for the internet "conference call" - yes - we would be pleased to. Best regards - Murray