X
Ocotillo Retreat 99
Flagstaff, AZ
May 18-19, 1999

welcome
location
agenda
discuss
photos
evaluation
next steps


This was one of the technology issues small groups brainstormed solutions/suggestions in the 'café' sessions. A summary report is from the discussions on day 2.


go to:
ocotillo central
Ocotillo.retreat.99 (café)

Café Sessions:
ISSUE:
Technology Staffing

QUESTION:
What is needed to better equip colleges with adequate staff to support instructional use of technology? What are appropriate staffing numbers/positions? What are are the enticements that would keep valuable staff from leaving for "greener" pastures?

e.g. hiring process, job descriptions, consistent titles/pay scales, attractions for jobs, district support?

IDEAS:

  1. Cross training to teach specialized skills to existing staff
  2. Training with commitment to years of service (with contract to keep it binding) => Entice
  3. Ratios: number of computers per person; student: teachers
  4. Student interns in labs; pay them higher rate than other CWS
  5. Enticement: $, competitive salary; salary schedule competitive to industry for technicians
  6. Training program delivered in variety of different formats
  7. Formula based ratio for amount of technology and support
  8. Non-competitive clause in MCCD--don't poach from each other
  9. Hiring at entry level appears to be equitable, but after they are trained we lose them because no increase in pay
  10. Technology classification in pay scale
  11. Have in-house technical training institute to certify our employees
  12. Cross-train and develop own partnership among college for resource and personnel sharing
  13. Professional growth opportunity for tech staff
  14. Number needed varies based on services, staffing, needs, etc., need to assess and strategic plan that support such
  15. Hays assessment missed technology concerns
  16. Good benefits, especially education; also flexible work schedules
  17. Use student internships as both a "grow-your-own" and augmenting of existing staff
  18. Identify the ratios used in private industry and at universities expressing proper staffing levels to number of desktops, total technology $, applications supported, etc.
  19. Administrative and executive buy-in to idea that, operational $ should be increased and balanced to cap $
  20. Keep good people by "Intel-like" sabbaticals (mandatory, every 7 years); ask employees what benefits they want; training; telecommuting
  21. Reassess salary levels and industry standards for numbers of workers, etc. to compete with business and industry
  22. Recognition of value of existing staff; be more flexible with work hours and duties; allow more independence
  23. Support professional growth
  24. Find out what incentives are important to individuals
  25. Cross-training of all workers and (??) jobs on a formal basis
  26. Career path; grow our own technology workers
  27. Support for CTCs for experimenting with instructional technology
  28. Reward (variety of ways) faculty for using CTLs to learn and same for support staff
  29. Research and find colleges/universities with success in staffing levels
  30. Informal bench-marking and visiting other colleges in our district and outside our district for staffing levels and positions
  31. Identify researchers at League technology conference in October 98 and get a copy of their study on support of technology
  32. Provide variety in assignments, flexible work environment
  33. Provide on-going training, support, and tools (cell-phone, paper, computer for home)
  34. Decide how many staff you need, then double it
  35. Rewrite job descriptions and salary schedule
  36. Have clear mission plan for technology and instruction
  37. Enticement: appreciation, rewards systems, flexible schedules, dollars, access to resources, offer growth opportunities
  38. Elevate technical level of faculty/staff to enable more self-sufficiency; mentoring (empowerment); reassigned time for faculty training
  39. Cross-training as a way to staff where needed during peak times
  40. Develop ratios based on: number of computers, programs, year
  41. Staffing requests tied to technology requests and vice versa
  42. Track technology staff movement: are they going to other Maricopa colleges or leaving the district? If there is a net loss, then salaries must be increased
  43. The amount of technical support will vary with the courses, skills, and knowledge of the faculty
  44. There are inequities among colleges, there needs to be equity; driven by FTSE and college size; larger colleges are more financially efficient
  45. Recruitment dollars; remove IT from restructure salary schedule (MAT)
  46. Depends on student head count and other needs of campus
  47. Formula based on number of machines
  48. "Grow more grass"
  49. New employee group "Technology"; accurate job descriptions and career path
  50. Work environment, telecommute, flex work hours
  51. Budget
  52. Cross-training; job enrichment
  53. Internships--number of staff to meet our need based on customer satisfaction surveys
  54. Adequate number of positions/lines
  55. Adequate quality and nature of preparation of staff
  56. New positions, revise existing job descriptions
  57. New system of rating job descriptions
  58. Adequate pay
  59. Adequate number staffing
  60. Training--send to training sessions
  61. Tools to do the job
  62. Work environment/recognize staff
  63. Job security
  64. Invite staff to be on technology committees
  65. Ratio of computers to techs, ratio of students to techs
  66. On-going training for new managers/supervisors
  67. Recognize/reward current employees to retain them
  68. Re/staffing numbers track the current and predict future needs
  69. Maintain satisfying and exciting work environment where employees feel involved
  70. Separate our technology staff from PSA and MAT manual
  71. Tie staffing to number of units--use a formula
  72. Link fund 7 to fund 1--staffing per units
  73. Provide more incentives to work for us--flex time, cafe benefits, ability to work from home
  74. Use English faculty (see Margaret's article) and grow our own students
  75. Support should be for whole campus, not just instructional
  76. A plan is needed before staffing needs are determined; levels of support need to be determined
  77. Competitive pay, cultivating student workers
  78. Treat staff as professionals
  79. Base pay on workload
  80. Training--staff and faculty, $
  81. Staffing based on campus size
  82. Support both morally and politically, money
  83. Do management training, learn people skills, communication, job training skills
  84. More flexible schedules
  85. Offer more challenging assignments; newer equipment, job training
  86. Dual career paths, management or technical--offer opportunity for both
  87. Mentor relationships
  88. Crew needs more respect from rest of college community
  89. Publicize current stable job environment--entice new employees
  90. Offer recruitment bonus
  91. Funding for internal and external technology communication and customer service training
  92. Frontline 50:1 (per UCLA)d
  93. Less stress, career path, professional development and training, give bonuses, creative funding and resources, telecommuting, flex scheduling, more contract employees
  94. Carl Center Model can be used to develop a ratio model
  95. Develop a staffing formula
  96. Contract out support
  97. Apprenticeship programs
  98. A template of an organizational structure, what is an ideal unit of services
  99. Centralized technology support for colleges--training, grow your own
  100. Training and development programs for technical people
  101. Make assessment/self-study skills available
  102. Commitment to instructional use of technology and then funds to support
  103. Rationale needed for use of technology--cost/benefit analysis needs
  104. Mechanism to share technology uses at various colleges
  105. Staffing in proportion to technology usage
  106. Money, time, recognition, and access to resources throughout district, staff development opportunities, friendly working environment
  107. Hire service to facilitate technology (outsource)