
Ocotillo Retreat 99 Flagstaff, AZ May 18-19, 1999

welcome
location
agenda
discuss
photos
evaluation
next steps

This was one of the technology issues small groups brainstormed solutions/suggestions in the 'café' sessions. A summary report is from the discussions on day 2.

go to:
ocotillo central
|
Ocotillo.retreat.99
(café)
ISSUE: Technology Staffing
QUESTION: What is needed to better equip colleges with adequate staff to support instructional use of technology? What are appropriate staffing numbers/positions? What are are the enticements that would keep valuable staff from leaving for "greener" pastures?
e.g. hiring process, job descriptions, consistent titles/pay scales, attractions for jobs, district support?
IDEAS:
- Cross training to teach specialized skills to existing staff
- Training with commitment to years of service (with contract to keep it binding) => Entice
- Ratios: number of computers per person; student: teachers
- Student interns in labs; pay them higher rate than other CWS
- Enticement: $, competitive salary; salary schedule competitive to industry for technicians
- Training program delivered in variety of different formats
- Formula based ratio for amount of technology and support
- Non-competitive clause in MCCD--don't poach from each other
- Hiring at entry level appears to be equitable, but after they are trained we lose them because no increase in pay
- Technology classification in pay scale
- Have in-house technical training institute to certify our employees
- Cross-train and develop own partnership among college for resource and personnel sharing
- Professional growth opportunity for tech staff
- Number needed varies based on services, staffing, needs, etc., need to assess and strategic plan that support such
- Hays assessment missed technology concerns
- Good benefits, especially education; also flexible work schedules
- Use student internships as both a "grow-your-own" and augmenting of existing staff
- Identify the ratios used in private industry and at universities expressing proper staffing levels to number of desktops, total technology $, applications supported, etc.
- Administrative and executive buy-in to idea that, operational $ should be increased and balanced to cap $
- Keep good people by "Intel-like" sabbaticals (mandatory, every 7 years); ask employees what benefits they want; training; telecommuting
- Reassess salary levels and industry standards for numbers of workers, etc. to compete with business and industry
- Recognition of value of existing staff; be more flexible with work hours and duties; allow more independence
- Support professional growth
- Find out what incentives are important to individuals
- Cross-training of all workers and (??) jobs on a formal basis
- Career path; grow our own technology workers
- Support for CTCs for experimenting with instructional technology
- Reward (variety of ways) faculty for using CTLs to learn and same for support staff
- Research and find colleges/universities with success in staffing levels
- Informal bench-marking and visiting other colleges in our district and outside our district for staffing levels and positions
- Identify researchers at League technology conference in October 98 and get a copy of their study on support of technology
- Provide variety in assignments, flexible work environment
- Provide on-going training, support, and tools (cell-phone, paper, computer for home)
- Decide how many staff you need, then double it
- Rewrite job descriptions and salary schedule
- Have clear mission plan for technology and instruction
- Enticement: appreciation, rewards systems, flexible schedules, dollars, access to resources, offer growth opportunities
- Elevate technical level of faculty/staff to enable more self-sufficiency; mentoring (empowerment); reassigned time for faculty training
- Cross-training as a way to staff where needed during peak times
- Develop ratios based on: number of computers, programs, year
- Staffing requests tied to technology requests and vice versa
- Track technology staff movement: are they going to other Maricopa colleges or leaving the district? If there is a net loss, then salaries must be increased
- The amount of technical support will vary with the courses, skills, and knowledge of the faculty
- There are inequities among colleges, there needs to be equity; driven by FTSE and college size; larger colleges are more financially efficient
- Recruitment dollars; remove IT from restructure salary schedule (MAT)
- Depends on student head count and other needs of campus
- Formula based on number of machines
- "Grow more grass"
- New employee group "Technology"; accurate job descriptions and career path
- Work environment, telecommute, flex work hours
- Budget
- Cross-training; job enrichment
- Internships--number of staff to meet our need based on customer satisfaction surveys
- Adequate number of positions/lines
- Adequate quality and nature of preparation of staff
- New positions, revise existing job descriptions
- New system of rating job descriptions
- Adequate pay
- Adequate number staffing
- Training--send to training sessions
- Tools to do the job
- Work environment/recognize staff
- Job security
- Invite staff to be on technology committees
- Ratio of computers to techs, ratio of students to techs
- On-going training for new managers/supervisors
- Recognize/reward current employees to retain them
- Re/staffing numbers track the current and predict future needs
- Maintain satisfying and exciting work environment where employees feel involved
- Separate our technology staff from PSA and MAT manual
- Tie staffing to number of units--use a formula
- Link fund 7 to fund 1--staffing per units
- Provide more incentives to work for us--flex time, cafe benefits, ability to work from home
- Use English faculty (see Margaret's article) and grow our own students
- Support should be for whole campus, not just instructional
- A plan is needed before staffing needs are determined; levels of support need to be determined
- Competitive pay, cultivating student workers
- Treat staff as professionals
- Base pay on workload
- Training--staff and faculty, $
- Staffing based on campus size
- Support both morally and politically, money
- Do management training, learn people skills, communication, job training skills
- More flexible schedules
- Offer more challenging assignments; newer equipment, job training
- Dual career paths, management or technical--offer opportunity for both
- Mentor relationships
- Crew needs more respect from rest of college community
- Publicize current stable job environment--entice new employees
- Offer recruitment bonus
- Funding for internal and external technology communication and customer service training
- Frontline 50:1 (per UCLA)d
- Less stress, career path, professional development and training, give bonuses, creative funding and resources, telecommuting, flex scheduling, more contract employees
- Carl Center Model can be used to develop a ratio model
- Develop a staffing formula
- Contract out support
- Apprenticeship programs
- A template of an organizational structure, what is an ideal unit of services
- Centralized technology support for colleges--training, grow your own
- Training and development programs for technical people
- Make assessment/self-study skills available
- Commitment to instructional use of technology and then funds to support
- Rationale needed for use of technology--cost/benefit analysis needs
- Mechanism to share technology uses at various colleges
- Staffing in proportion to technology usage
- Money, time, recognition, and access to resources throughout district, staff development opportunities, friendly working environment
- Hire service to facilitate technology (outsource)
|