X
Ocotillo Retreat 99
Flagstaff, AZ
May 18-19, 1999

welcome
location
agenda
discuss
photos
evaluation
next steps


This was one of the technology issues small groups brainstormed solutions/suggestions in the 'café' sessions. A summary report is from the discussions on day 2.


go to:
ocotillo central
Ocotillo.retreat.99 (café)

Café Sessions:
ISSUE:
Faculty/Staff Development for Technology

QUESTION:
Given the demands and shortage of staff to do so, what are creative ways we can provide support for the use of instructional technology? What can be done collaboratively?

IDEAS:

  1. Expand/develop programs based on MCC Student Technical Assistant
  2. Organize/encourage information sharing among technology groups
  3. Hardware, software, courseware
  4. Cooperation/collaborations
  5. International council on technology--collaborate across district
  6. ITS employee group--increases professionalism, attach dollars for this group, increase pay, etc.
  7. Professional growth for ITS, internships with Intel, etc., for computer/technology people--look at positive work environment
  8. District technology pool
  9. Internships for students with technology talent, Help Desk programs and curriculum
  10. Combine media and computer services with cross-training and flexible scheduling
  11. Choose products with built-in help features to enable users to become self-directed learners
  12. Outsource
  13. Student Technology Assistants
  14. Hire staff for adequate support but not at expense of other lines with adequate compensation; create flexibility for increases in salary
  15. Release time for faculty to develop
  16. Contract to academic services for technology-oriented development of academic materials and use dollars for campus support; i.e., students working with faculty supervision on K-12 materials
  17. Instructional technology could be anything from e-mail for a distance learning course to an overhead projector
  18. Utilize faculty mentors--reward them, give them release time
  19. "Just in time" give support for faculty in learning how to utilize assistants; faculty should work on a problem no longer than 15 minutes before calling for help; Cathege College uses this model
  20. Need a trainer for the faculty; a room for faculty training would be nice
  21. Training for faculty should be modular and cover specific, limited, well-defined subjects; good documentation should be made available to the faculty
  22. Hire students or give students incentives (scholarships, experience, recognition) to act as resources for faculty and staff
  23. On-line help or various types of contractual help, CDs, help desks, videos, listservs or discussion groups
  24. Develop list of people with expertise to act as resources for colleges or cross-colleges
  25. Multiple ways of course development--CDs, manual, video, classroom; staff and faculty take college courses
  26. Cross-college collaboration and development versus every college creating their own
  27. Use a mentoring system of training--first train mentors then train colleges
  28. Expand DO training menu--be creative in enticing use of DO resources
  29. Use students as training resources
  30. Use web self-training sites--establish district-based site or web that provides self-training in technology for all employees
  31. Create district of trainers/expertise throughout district
  32. Assess who needs training--establish minimum standard of expertise
  33. Job rotation
  34. Teach students skills needed and hire back part-time when course is completed
  35. Partner with private industry to teach us technology skills needed an we reciprocate with tuition wavers
  36. Partner with industry to swap "skills" training (i.e., technology and English courses)
  37. Partner with other colleges/universities and swap training needed--includes faculty exchanges
  38. Develop RFP; identify technology training needed and use Maricopa employees as FTSE (work with legal on this)
  39. Student tech assistant programs, salary and credit to assist organization, internship, college credit, work experience, portfolio (resume)
  40. Collaborative training for design and implementation in district learning with CEU credit and/or release time
  41. Use mentors to train in technical areas; mentors deserve incentives, e.g., release time or salaries
  42. Same as above with alternative delivery, for example, web-based modules with credit, etc. incentives
  43. District clearinghouse of technology based training modules with incentives for completion; financially self-sustaining by making available to outside
  44. District needs to establish a true development center focusing on instruction and teaching applications and integrate
  45. Centralize district training that focuses on application and must be relevant
  46. More internships and mentoring; we need to adopt a TA model like universities
  47. Training user to go first level troubleshooting--software glitches, check extension/connections; use student technician assistants
  48. Release time for faculty to train--software applications used for classrooms and basic troubleshooting; each division/department have first-line person to do troubleshooting; depends on who is open to learning
  49. More conversation with instruction "Teach a man to fish"
  50. Campus-defined direction; what drives use of technology ex: onset of use of TVs in classroom; direction of college, high technology use
  51. TLTRs can create functional groups to collaborate on providing support for the use of instructional technology
  52. District-level trainers to work with small groups of faculty/staff--workshops at colleges
  53. Faculty on reassignment with expertise do training workshops
  54. Adjunct Faculty Institute--preparatory program Friday/Saturday seminars
  55. Internships for students from computing classes, could assist faculty and techs
  56. CTLs existing at larger colleges; MCLI could provide district-wide; shared CTLs for smaller colleges
  57. Buy don't build technology; use interns/students; grow your own
  58. Train an expert faculty member who becomes a mentor; just in time training
  59. Train division support staff in technology; effective initial training
  60. Summer Train-the-Trainer between colleges for faculty mentor
  61. Videos, computer-based training, web-based training, CDs, buddy system
  62. Conferences, work with groups--faculty and technology; ITP--individual tech plan; create ITP incentives and awards
  63. Create priority system; create corporate, business, industry, academic institutions--collaborate, mentor, volunteer programs
  64. Have specialist cross train; train-the-trainer model
  65. Faculty professional growth association--use funding, etc.
  66. District have experts for common technology problems
  67. Back-up machines for crisis--will improve faculty/staff relations
  68. Preventative maintenance--routinely inspect all equipment--perhaps midnight--6 shift--could be student workers
  69. Electronic warning system to notify support when machines fail--automatic--before instructor calls
  70. Rotate staff to different computers for 3-4 weeks to share knowledge and practices
  71. Share with others computer innovations and tech uses
  72. Provide reassign time for faculty to work cross discipline in teams
  73. Possible outsource
  74. Sharing technical support
  75. Internship with graduate students for creativity
  76. Internships (early) for potential computer techs/instructors
  77. Partnerships between universities and Maricopa
  78. STAs training faculty
  79. Publicize and showcase technology skills of faculty; 1st week of accountability?; potential short term
  80. Department chair presentations--perhaps video sessions
  81. Technology exchanges between instructional faculty
  82. Department projects in technological development for professional development
  83. Share what you learn during professional development when you return