 |
notes from the wall
from the 1996 Ocotillo Retreat
the wall //
General /
No Ocotillo /
New Ideas /
Plus/Delta /
Comments /
Assume there is no Ocotillo...
- District=> Dialogues
- ID Problems
- ? solutions implementation => lack ability to engage 80%
- Move from problem solving to implementation to tangilbel products that people can see how change can better what they do
- Do at Grass Roots level esle "suspect"
- Tangible Products
- Promote different teaching methods; ask specific colleges to take leadership
- Intercollege cooperation
- Interdisciplinary--Discipline Web Pages--share questions/answers create Dialogues via Web
- ? survey faculty about Web => flashlight
- Interdiscipline learning teams districtwide
- Dev. cross disciplinary IC
- Change college schedules -- M-Th T-Fr W=interaction w/students M-Th=more days for stud. prep, lab T-Fr
- Training for 80% look at Faculty Development
- Take $$ from dialogue => specific faculty initiatives and share results
- Combine expert areas
- Dont' stop at recommendation of training
- Link to products apply to grants for participation=>implementation
- Ongoing sharing of concern and awareness, success
- Support structure to pilot
- People coming together for a common passion=> evolves new structures and products
- Id single direction and move from start to finish vs. so many nultiple agendas that are shotgunned
- Focus resources on what we do best
- Why are we reinventing wheel if someone has done it better
- NIH not invented here
- We don't share across collegtes because of FTSE competition
- ? centralize/decentralize
- ? different $$ allocation model
- How will Policy Governance model support common "ends" -- what we want to achieve
- $$ allocation to "dist"
- If emphasis in ET/L -- what/how do we achieve it?
- Web Pages for dialogues -- created by AL
- Put 3 goals from video to begin dialogue
- Schedule based on learners/customer vs. "us" faculty
- Ocotillo could provide training in technology for faculty
- Projects in Ocotillo, not just Ocotillo talking about technology
- Are we letting "technology" shpae teaching (rather than seeking ou;a technology that is available for a specific teacher or course?)
- Maybe technology for technology's sake is hindering learning?
- Teach ("train") teaching methodologies (collaborative learning, distance learning, etc.) -- not just have Ocotillo look at "technology"
- Maybe each college take the lead in a certain methodology
- Should "technology" mean just "computers" or other technologies?
- collaborative learning, activated learning, service learning, curriculum process, continuous quality improvmeent in learning, alternative methods of assessment, using multimedia and technology, etc.
- "Promoting" means interested faculty at a campus become specialists ina certan methodology, those faculty provide workshops for entire district
- Staff development--how do we get better access to individual faculty
- Incentives for part-time faculty
- Access problems
- To assist teachers => support on campus
- instructional technology, instructional design, assessment / Studio 1151, experts on campus
- Virtual community on Internet -- topical interests
- Virtual Ocotillo w/resident experts (self-identify); keep chanes for inter-college communication
- Better use of Convocation -- not done well now; mini-conference where faculty share or dialogue rooms
- Redirect funds for Lodestar, PEP Grants, Ocotillo, Faculty Staff Development, Dialogue Days => where do they get support? Each campus gets $$ to do what they need to do
- 3 common events during year
- Change the district paradigm for how to support instruction--move support to campus
- Don't put campuses in position to do dog & pony shows so we can beg and compete for students
- Bring district to campus
- Go to expert areas rather than district, disciplines, colleges
- Where is innovation?
- Can we go beyond Think Tank recommendations to planning & implementation?
- Old Ocotillo standards -- do they have values now? are the shelved?
- Faculty need time for plan/implementation who can decide? Presidents?
- Need time for development/professional growth creativity
- FTSE competition for $$ dominates time for development (change w/times)
- Truth in advertising--4 ENG101 classes taught in different methods and advertised as such in schedule
- Database of all Maricopa classes then student inputs her variable (west valley, tuesday, 6 p.m., ?)
- Expert areas, development, plan/implementation
- New Ocotillo
- District support training facility using faculty to learn new technology who then train others
- Challenge MCCCD Policies:
- Assessment (need a more accurate system than ASSET)
- Voluntary Placement (need advised placement in Eng, Rdg, Math, no waivers)
But would only work if Assessment was more accurate
- Faculty evaluation--let's do something about instructors w/high attrition rates
- PT faculty needs more training opportunities for effective teaching
- Would like more control--students want to be engaged
- Some like groups/some don't/dislike schedule orientation--teacher to be available
- Individualize teaching
- Teachers need to able to meet different learning styles and ways students want to learn
- Students want variety
- Students need to be motivated to learn on own
- Students want ways to collaborate--those who want to will (Integrate ways to give students opportunity to engage)
|